INTEGRATING EUROPEAN SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY VALUES INTO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN TIMES OF UNCERTAINTY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2026.2.53

Keywords:

management, corporate governance, sustainable development, corporate social responsibility, European integration, corporate resilience, uncertainty management

Abstract

The increasing volatility of global economic systems, geopolitical instability, climate-related risks and technological transformation have significantly intensified the uncertainty within which corporations operate. Under such conditions, traditional shareholder-oriented management models reveal structural limitations in ensuring long-term stability and resilience. This study argues that the integration of European corporate social responsibility (CSR) values into corporate management constitutes a strategic response to systemic uncertainty and a necessary condition for sustainable development. The purpose of the article is to systematize the theoretical foundations of European CSR values and to identify the structural components of corporate management that enable their effective integration. The research is based on an interdisciplinary synthesis of stakeholder theory, sustainable development theory, institutional theory, and the resource-based view of the firm. Methods of theoretical generalization and structural analysis are applied to construct an integrated framework of value-based corporate governance. The findings demonstrate that the European CSR paradigm represents a multidimensional governance model grounded in stakeholder inclusiveness, environmental stewardship, transparency, accountability, and long-term value creation. Unlike shareholder-centric approaches, the European model treats corporate responsibility as an embedded institutional obligation integrated into strategic planning, risk management, governance architecture, organizational culture, and performance measurement systems. Key structural components facilitating CSR integration include boardlevel oversight, sustainability-oriented strategic management, ESG-based risk management, stakeholder engagement within network governance structures, and transparent reporting mechanisms. Their coherent interaction strengthens corporate legitimacy, reduces systemic risks, and enhances adaptive capacity under volatile conditions. The study concludes that embedding European CSR values into corporate management systems represents a structural transformation that reinforces sustainable development and redefines corporate governance as a resilience-oriented and socially embedded economic institution.

References

Carroll A. B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.

Donaldson T., Preston L. E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 65–91. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/258887.

Freeman R. E. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108539500.

Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 2006. Vol. 84, № 12. P. 78–92.

A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. Brussels : European Commission, 2011. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0681.

Corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD). Brussels : European Commission, 2021. URL: https://www.

europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662944/IPOL_STU(2021)662944_EN.pdf.

Collin S.-O. Towards a critique of corporate governance research. (Lazy Paper Series No. 1). Free University of Scania. 2023. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4411637.

Collin S.-O., Ponomareva Y., Ottosson S., Sundberg N. Governance strategy and costs: Board compensation in Sweden. Journal of Management and Governance. 2017. Vol. 21, № 3. P. 685–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9350-0.

Прокопішина О., Козубова Н. Корпоративна соціальна відповідальність в понятійно-категоріальному апараті управління сталим розвитком. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Економіка. 2026. № 27. URL: http://tnv-econom. ksauniv.ks.ua/index.php/journal/issue/view/27.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07