COMPARISON OF DISCRETISATION SCHEMES FOR CONVECTION TERMS IN THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS IN OPENFOAM SOFTWARE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/mathematical-modelling/2026-9-1-2

Keywords:

advection schemes, OpenFOAM, vortex shedding

Abstract

Laminar vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder is a canonical benchmark for validating numerical methods, yet quantitative predictions at moderate Reynolds numbers remain sensitive to the discretization of convective terms. In opensource CFD frameworks, the wide choice of advection schemes introduces a trade-off between numerical diffusion, dispersion, stability, and boundedness. The objective of this study is to evaluate how different advection discretization schemes available in OpenFOAM influence the accuracy of force coefficients, shedding frequency, and wake structures for two-dimensional incompressible flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds number Re = 200. The flow is simulated using the transient incompressible solver pimpleFoam on a structured O-type grid, with mesh and time-step independence verification. A consistent computational setup is employed while comparing a range of schemes, including linearUpwind, limitedLinear, cubic, limitedCubic, MUSCL, and SuperBee, including their vector-based (‘V’) variants. The influence of gradient limiters on the solution is studied. The performance is assessed by comparing drag and lift coefficients, Strouhal numbers (St), and the qualitative resolution of vorticity contours against established experimental and numerical data. The results indicate that the choice of scheme profoundly impacts solution fidelity. High-resolution schemes such as MUSCLV and SuperBeeV yielded force coefficients that deviated significantly from reference values, while standard limitedLinear and limitedCubic schemes resulted in under-predictions due to excessive numerical diffusion. However, the use of vector-based limiters noticeably improved accuracy. Among the tested numerical schemes, linearUpwind and linearUpwindV offers the most consistent balance between accuracy, stability, and smooth wake resolution. Furthermore, these were the only schemes capable of resolving smooth, undistorted vorticity contours in the wake, whereas others introduced significant unphysical distortions. These results highlight the critical role of advection scheme selection in vortex-dominated flows. The paper provides practical recommendations for reliable modeling of incompressible fluid flows using OpenFOAM.

References

Moukalled F., Mangani L., Darwish M. The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid Dynamics An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM® and Matlab. Switzerland : Springer International Publishing, 2016. 792 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16874-6

Versteeg H. K., Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics. The finite volume method. Longman House, Burnt Mill, Harlow Essex: Longman Scientific and Technical, 1995. 517 p.

OpenFOAM v2506 C++ Source Code Guide. URL: https://api.openfoam.com/2506/ (access date: 22.01.2026

Greenshields C., Weller H. Notes on Computational Fluid Dynamics : General Principles. Reading, UK: CFD Direct Ltd, 2022. 291 p. https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=Ox0uzwEACAAJ

Posdziech O., Grundmann R. A systematic approach to the numerical calculation of fundamental quantities of the two-dimensional flow over a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2007. Vol. 23. iss. 3. P. 479–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.09.004

Norberg C. Fluctuating lift on a circular cylinder: review and new measurements. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2003. Vol. 17. № 1. P. 57–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-9746(02)00099-3

Ferziger J. H., Perić M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 3rd ed. Berlin, Heilderberg, New York, Barcelona, Hong Kong, London, Milan, Paris, Tokyo: Springer, 2002. 442 с.

Çandır S. Investigation of numerical Schemes and their effects on impact pressures in numerical modelling : master’s thesis : February 2022 / Middle East Technical University, 2022. 97 p.

Leakey S., Glennis V., Hewett C. Artificial compressibility with Riemann solvers: convergence of limiters on unstructured meshes. OpenFOAM Journal. 2022. Т. 2. С. 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v2.49

Liu Y., Hinrichsen O. CFD modeling of bubbling fluidized beds using OpenFOAM: Model validation and comparison of TVD differencing schemes. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2014. Vol. 69. P. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.07.002

Qu L., Norberg C., Davidson L., Peng S. H., Wang F. Quantitative numerical analysis of flow past a circular cylinder at Reynolds number between 50 and 200. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2013. Vol. 39. P. 347–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.02.007

Choi J. I., Oberoi R. C., Edwards J. R., Rosati J. A. An immersed boundary method for complex incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics. 2007. Vol. 224. P. 757–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.032

Liu C., Zheng X., Sung C. Preconditioned multigrid methods for unsteady incompressible flows. Journal of Computational Physics. 1998. Vol. 139. iss. 1. P. 35–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1997.5859

OpenFOAM® Documentation. URL: https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/overview (access date: 22.01.2026)

Verma S. A large eddy simulation study of the effects of wind and slope on the structure of a turbulent line fire : Ph.D thesis. / Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland. University of Maryland, 2019. 210 p. URL: https://drum.lib.umd.edu/items/02fc3fbddaa5-4cf0-8ad4-292a9135ca05 (access date: 22.01.2026).

Greenshields С. OpenFOAM v12 User Guide. London : The OpenFOAM Foundation, 2024. URL: https://doc.cfd.direct/openfoam/user-guide-v12. (access date: 22.01.2026).

Roshko A. On the development of turbulent of turbulent wake from vortex streets. NACA-TR-1191. Washington, D.C, 1954. URL: https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/96268/Thesis_Revised_v1.pdf (access date: 22.01.2026).

Williamson C. H. K. Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1989. Vol. 206. P. 579–627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112089002429

Published

2026-07-01