APPLICATION OF THE CONICAL APPROXIMATION OF NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS TO COMPUTER MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE OF SUPERSONIC SHEAR FLOWS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/mathematical-modelling/2025-8-1-16

Keywords:

conical approximation of Navier – Stokes equations, shock waves, turbulent boundary layer, flow separation, computer simulation

Abstract

The study of supersonic turbulent separation flows is one of the main problems of modern aerodynamics, which has both fundamental and practical significance. From a practical point of view, the spatial distributions of gas-dynamic parameters affect the aerodynamic characteristics of supersonic aircraft, compressors, and turbines. The theoretical interest in this class of flows is due to the fact that all the main phenomena characteristic of viscous-inviscid interactions occur here: significant parameter gradients, flow separation, turbulence, intensive heat exchange with the flowing surface. Investigation of the physical features of the shock waves/turbulent boundary layers interactions (SWBLI) acquires special importance.Known results of studies of the interaction of shock waves with boundary layers were obtained mainly by experi- mental methods. However, the conducting of the blowing in wind tunnels or full-scale flight tests is associated with both large financial costs and a limited amount of measured data.The Navier – Stokes equations, Reynolds or Favre averages (RANS), are currently the basis of computational aero- dynamics. Complete information about the flow provides the researcher with more opportunities to identify the character- istic physical features of the interacting flows. The use of modern numerical methods, differential turbulence models, and detailed computational grids allows the flow under study to be reproduced with a high degree of reliability.The conical approximation of the compressible gas Navier – Stokes equations makes it possible to use a more detailed calculation grid for modeling supersonic flows with the appropriate symmetry of the flow separation, which in turn leads to the possibility of computer reconstruction of small details of the interactions. The implicit finite-volume technique in present paper is based on the second order Roe scheme. The implementation of the Spalart – Allmaras differential turbulence model adapted to supersonic flows is considered. Verification of the developed algorithms and the program complex was carried out on the problem of supersonic turbulent flow around a sharp cone at a supercritical angle of attack.

References

Settles G.S., Lu F.K. Conical similarity of shock/boundary-layer interactions generated by swept and unswept fins. AIAA Journal. 1985. № 23. Р. 1021–1027.

Settles G.S., Horstman C.C., McKenzie T.M. Experimental and computational study of a swept compression corner interaction flowfield. AIAA Journal. 1986. № 24. Р. 744–752.

Green J.E. Interactions between shock waves and turbulent boundary layers. Progress in aerospace sciences. 1970. № 11. Р. 235–340.

Adamson T.C., Messiter A.F. Analysis of two-dimensional interaction between shock waves and boundary layers. Annual review of fluid mechanics. 1980. № 12. Р. 103–138.

Dolling D. Fifty years of shock wave boundary layer interaction research: what next? AIAA Journal. 2001. № 39. Р. 1517–1531.

Settles G.S., Dolling D.S. Swept Shock Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions (Review). In book: Tactical Missile Aerodynamics, Chapter: 8. Publisher: American Institute of Aeronatics and Astronautics. 1986. P. 297–379.

Lillard R.P. Turbulence Modeling for Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions. Biblioscholar. 2013. Р. 218.

Wagner A. Experimental Hypersonic Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Studies on a Flat Plate at Elevated Surface Temperature. DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FUR LUFT – UND RAUMFAHRT E.V. Report AFRL-AFOSR-UK-TR-2022-0026-45. 2022.

Chen Y. Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interaction: A Survey of Recent Development. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2024. № 12. Р. 422–430.

Tannehill J.C., Anderson D.A., Pletcher R.H. Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Taylor & Francis. New York. 1997.

Pulliam T.H. Efficient solution methods for the Navier-Stokes equations. Lecture notes for the von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Series, Von Karman Institute. 1985.

Lin A., Rubin S.G. Three-dimensional supersonic viscous flow over cone at incidence. AIAA Paper. 1981. Р. 192.

Spalart P.R. Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulation. Intern. Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 2000. № 21. Р. 252–263.

Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann schemes. Journal of Computational Physics. 1987. № 43. Р. 357–372.

Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics 1: Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics. 1995. № 4. Р. 171–218.

Pylypenko A.O., Polevoy O.B., Prykhodko O.A. Numerical simulation of Mach number and angle of attack influence on regimes of transonic turbulent flows over airfoils. TsAGI Science Journal. 2012. № 43 (1). Р. 1–36.

Redchyts D.O., Polevoy O.B. Numerical simulation of the conjugate problems of computational aerodynamics. Internationally-scientific conference “Modern information and technology on transport”. (Kherson, 15–18.04.2015). Kherson. 2015. Р. 217–220.

Polevoy O.B., Redchyts, D.O. Two Shock Waves Self-Induced Oscillations over NACA 0012 Airfoil at Low Angles of Attack. Topical Problems of Fluid Mechanics. (Prague, 12–14.12.2023). Prague, 2023. Р. 137–144. https://doi.org/10.14311/TPFM.2023.019

Rainbird W.J. Turbulent boundary-layer growth and separation on a yawed cone. AIAA Journal. 1968. № 6 (12). Р. 2410–2416.

Published

2025-05-27