TAXONOMY AND ARCHITECTURAL CLASSIFICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES: OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE APPLICATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2025.2.2.3Keywords:
blockchain, marketplace, decentralized computing, DAG, PoS, consensus, metrics, typologyAbstract
Modern centralized computing services do not provide a sufficient level of decentralization, transparency, and scalability, which limits their use in open ecosystems. There is a growing need for a well-founded selection of a blockchain architecture for the development of an efficient computing power marketplace that combines security, performance, and economic viability. The subject of the present analytical study is the architectural characteristics and evaluation metrics of blockchain technologies for building decentralized platforms for computational resource exchange.The goal of the study is to systematize knowledge of blockchain architecture types, consensus algorithms, and performance metrics to justify the technological basis for the creation of a custom computing power marketplace.The tasks addressed in the paper include: classification of blockchain architectures by openness, consensus type, and scalability approach; comparative analysis of technical, functional, and economic metrics of leading platforms (Ethereum, Polkadot, Hyperledger Fabric, IOTA, Solana); review of existing marketplaces such as Akash, Golem, and iExec to identify their strengths and limitations; and formulation of requirements for a custom solution.As a result of the analytical review, a systematic typology of blockchain solutions was developed and architectural comparison metrics were generalized with respect to the blockchain trilemma (decentralization – scalability – security).A comparative analysis of five modern platforms (Ethereum, Hyperledger, Polkadot, Solana, IOTA) was conducted in terms of their applicability for a computing power marketplace.It was found that DAG-oriented architectures (e.g., IOTA) offer higher scalability potential but require improvements in security mechanisms. BFT-based platforms demonstrate high throughput but are limited in terms of open access.Principles for constructing a hybrid architecture based on edge computing were proposed, enabling efficient load balancing, reduced latency, and greater autonomy among participants in a distributed computational environment.Conclusions: The application of a typified approach to selecting blockchain architecture enables the avoidance of common limitations of existing systems and ensures high adaptability, efficiency, and transparency in the new computing power marketplace.
References
Nardini M., Helmer S., El Ioini N., Pahl C. A Blockchain-based Decentralized Electronic Marketplace for Computing Resources. SN Computer Science, 2020, 1:251. DOI: 10.1007/s42979-020-00243-7.
Akash Network. Akash Whitepaper: Decentralized Cloud Computing Marketplace. 2023. Available at: https://akash.network/whitepaper.
Uriarte R. B., DeNicola R. Blockchain-based decentralized cloud/fog solutions: Challenges, opportunities, and standards. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2018, т. 2, № 3. DOI: 10.1109/MCOMSTD.2018.1800020
Mssassi S., Abou El Kalam A. The Blockchain Trilemma: A Formal Proof of the Inherent Trade-Offs among Decentralization, Security, and Scalability. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(1):19. DOI: 10.3390/app15010019
Vujičić D., Jagodić D., Ranđić S. Blockchain technology, bitcoin, and Ethereum: A brief overview. 21–23 March 2018. DOI: 10.1109/INFOTEH.2018.8345547
Song W., Lu D., Zhu M., Zhu C., Zhao J., Sun Y., Li L.. Blockchain Bottleneck Analysis Based on Performance Metrics Causality. Electronics, 2024, 13(21):4236. DOI: 10.3390/electronics13214236
Croman K., Decker C., Eyal I., Efe Gencer A., Juels A., Kosba A., Miller A., Saxena P., Shi E., Gün Sirer E., Song D., Wattenhofer R. On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains. In: Financial Cryptography and Data Security, LNCS 9604, Springer, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_9
Khan M. M., Khan F. S., Nadeem M., Khan T. H., Haider S., Daas D. Scalability and Efficiency Analysis of Hyperledger Fabric and Private Ethereum in Smart Contract Execution. Computers, 2025. DOI: 10.3390/ computers14040132
Kahmann F., Honecker F., Dreyer J., Fisher M., Tönjes R. Performance Comparison of Directed Acyclic Graph- Based Distributed Ledgers and Blockchain Platforms. Computers, 2023, 12(12):257. DOI: 10.3390/computers12120257
Fan C., Ghaemi S., Khazaei H., Chen Y, Musilek P. Performance Analysis of the IOTA DAG-based Distributed Ledger. 2021. DOI: 10.7939/r3-w1c1-wt05
Fan C., Ghaemi S., Khazaei H., Musilek P. Performance Analysis of the IOTA Tangle. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, с. 37290–37301. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063040
Abbas H. Analysis of Polkadot: Architecture, Internals, and Contradictions. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Blockchain, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/Blockchain55522.2022.00019
Yakovenko A. Solana: A New Architecture for a High-Performance Blockchain. White Paper, 2018. Available at: https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf
Chakravorti S., Zhang Z., Yelamarthi K. Comparative Study of Blockchain Performance Metrics: Analyzing Transaction Speed, Scalability, and Energy Efficiency. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2023, 212, 103570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103570
Zheng Z., Xie S., Dai H., Chen X., Wang H. An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends. Proc. IEEE Big Data Congress, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/BigDataCongress.2017.85







