MODEL FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-LEARNING PROCESS COMPONENT BASED ON ELEMENTARY DIDACTIC INDICATORS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2025.3.2.40

Keywords:

online learning, LMS platform, Quality Assessment Model, distance learning, electronic learning process

Abstract

The paper shows the features of evaluating the e-learning process within the educational space, presents a technology for evaluating the effectiveness (overall quality) of an online course (a component of the e-learning process) using a set of selected elementary didactic indicators. Modern distance education is characterized by a steady trend of transition to digitalization and personification of the educational process. Modernization of education is currently associated with the introduction of adaptive, practice-oriented and flexible tools for assessing the quality of the e-learning process. Existing educational information systems for creating and evaluating the quality of e-learning courses, do not yet have the ability to intellectualize the learning process, flexibly adapt the content of education to the individual needs of participants in the educational process, do not contain convenient intellectual tools to support developers of online courses, automate routine operations for structuring educational content. The concept of evaluating the components of the educational environment, which is formed using a group of selected elementary didactic indicators based on the basic attributes of the electronic educational process, is presented. Groups of qualitative indicators of the effectiveness of the organization of the electronic educational process are identified, which provide the process of systematic analysis of the effectiveness of the use of technology and methods of distance education. Their specific choice and formation of groups of indicators is determined by the goals and objectives of a comprehensive assessment of the e-learning process. Based on the scheme of selection and formation of elementary didactic indicators, a method and model for evaluating the effectiveness (quality) of the use of technology, method or component of the electronic educational process within the educational environment has been developed. The paper shows that in the simplest case, the general procedure for evaluating and examining the components of the electronic educational process is based on mathematical processing of the set of course quality indicators evaluated by experts (determining the importance and informative value of indicators, averaging, elementary didactic indicators). Efficient intelligent data processing algorithms underlie the development of adaptive online learning technologies implemented in educational processes. The basic principles of synthesizing a system for evaluating the quality of online courses are developed.

References

Kintonova A., Sabitov A., Povkhan I., Khaimulina D., Gabdreshov G. Organization of online learning using the intelligent metasystem of open semantic technology for intelligent systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 2023. № 1(2–121). P. 29–40.

Kintonova A., Sabitov A., Povkhan I. Development of an Online Course for “Web Programming” discipline with OLAT. 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON): Conference Proceedings (Riga (Latvia), May 9–12, 2022). Riga, 2022. P. 54–62.

Kintonova A., Povkhan I., Sabitov A., Tokkuliyeva A., Demidchik N. Online Learning Technologies. 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON): Conference Proceedings (Riga (Latvia), May 9–12, 2022). Riga, 2022. P. 76–84.

Alt D., Naamati-Schneider L. Health management students’ self-regulation and digital concept mapping in online learning environments. BMC Medical Education. 2021. Volume 21, Issue 1. Article Number 110.

Ferrer N. F., Alfonso J. M. E-Learning Content Management. New York (USA): Springer, 2010. 132 p.

How E-learning Platforms Are Gaining Popularity In The Ecommerce Industry. Punjab (India): FATbit Technologies, 2024. URL: https://www.fatbit.com/fab/online-learning-vs-traditionallearning-a-study-on-elearning-platform/

Pappas C. Top 20 eLearning Statistics For 2019 You Need To Know [Infographic]. Reno (NV, USA): eLearning Industry, 2019. URL: https://elearningindustry.com/top-elearning-statistics-2019

Siegel K. iSpring Suite 9: The Basics. Riva (USA): IconLogic, Inc., 2020. 119 p.

Caudill B., Banks D. Pocket instruction for SCORM. West Palm Beach (Florida, USA): JCASolutions, 2006. 114 p.

What is AICC. London (UK): Growth Engineering Technologies, 2022. URL: https://www.growthengineering.co.uk/what-is-aicc/

Revilova O., Santos O., Restrepo E. G. WCAG 2 in simple terms. Madrid (Spain): Itákora Press, 2015. 53 p.

Blokduk G. A clear and concise XAPI reference. Toronto (Canada): 5STARCooks, 2018. 137 p.

Masud Md., Huang X. An E-learning System Architecture based on Cloud Computing. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 2012. Vol. 62. P. 74–78.

Chiasson A. Mastering Articulate Storyline. Birmingham (UK): Packt Publishing, 2016. 28 p.

Education at a Glance 2011. Paris (France): OECD Publishing, 2011. 320 p.

Ruiz-Corbella M., Alvarez-Gonzalez B. Virtual Mobility as an Inclusion Strategy in Higher Education: research on Distance Education Master degrees in Europe, Latin America and Asia. Research in Comparative and International Education. 2014. Vol. 9, Iss. 1. P. 165–180.

Wit H. de., Ferencz I., Rumbley L. E. International student mobility: European and US perspectives. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 17, Iss. 1. P. 17–23.

Published

2025-11-28