INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR DETERMINING QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF METAL PRODUCTS IN LAYER-BY-LAYER FORMATION PROCESSES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2025.4.1.11

Keywords:

metal additive manufacturing, machine learning, melt pool, digital twin, porosity, quality control

Abstract

The study examines intelligent technologies for assessing the quality of metal parts produced by layer-wise additive manufacturing. Based on an analysis of recent publications, the main defect types in laser powder bed fusion processes are summarized together with their links to powder morphology, melting regimes and microstructural evolution. It is shown that the combination of computer-vision and machine-learning methods enables automated powder characterization, in-situ melt-pool monitoring, detection of anomalous regimes and layer-wise porosity prediction. Particular attention is given to digital twins of additive processes, which reproduce thermal, mechanical and microstructural fields and support multi-scenario optimization of printing parameters before physical experiments are carried out. The feasibility of integrating physics-based simulation data, process-monitoring signals and microstructural characterization results into a unified intelligent quality-control system focused on safety-critical machine-building components is substantiated. A structural scheme of such a system is proposed, comprising modules for raw-material analysis, process planning, in-situ monitoring, defect prediction, adaptive control and post-process validation. It is demonstrated that the implementation of such systems provides a basis for self-learning additive manufacturing lines, reduces porosity levels and improves the repeatability of mechanical properties of parts. The scientific contribution of the work lies in consolidating current approaches to coupling digital twins with deep-learning models and in formulating a generalized architecture of an intelligent quality-assessment framework for metal additive manufacturing. The practical relevance is associated with the potential to reduce the scope of destructive testing, shorten the time-to-market for new products and increase the reliability of critical structural elements operating under demanding service conditions.

References

Yeshiwas T. A., Tiruneh A. B., Sisay M. A. A review article on the assessment of additive manufacturing. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Engineering. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s40712-025-00306-8.

Gao B., Wu D., Wang Y. et al. A review of research progress in selective laser melting (SLM). Micromachines. 2023. Vol. 14, No. 1, 57. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-666X/14/1/57

Hu Z., Gao X., Li Y. et al. Machine learning assisted quality control in metal additive manufacturing: a review. Advanced Powder Materials. 2025. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772834X25000788

He W., Zhu L., Liu C., Jiang H. Metal additive manufacturing and molten pool dynamic characterization monitoring: advances in machine learning for DED. Metals. 2025. Vol. 15, No. 2, 106. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4701/15/2/106

Oster S., Breese P. P., Ulbricht A., Mohr G., Altenburg S. J. A deep learning framework for defect prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring in laser powder bed fusion. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2024. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-deep-learning-framework-for-defect-prediction-on-Oster-Breese/6ed6b2496fa689d99c9a7 16ab873dce3b87f36a6

Mohammed A. S., Almutahhar M., Sattar K. et al. Deep learning based porosity prediction for additively manufactured laser powder-bed fusion parts. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023. Vol. 27, p. 7330–7335. https://pure.kfupm.edu.sa/en/publications/deep-learning-based-porosity-prediction-for-additively-manufactur/

Ben Amor S., Brissaud D., Rivette M. Digital twin implementation in additive manufacturing: A comprehensive review. Processes. 2024. Vol. 12, No. 6, 1062. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/12/6/1062

Tudorache L., Mihai A., Constantin G. et al. Current approaches to digital twins in additive manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40964-025-01262-7

Fousová M., Vojtěch D., Kubásek J. et al. Metallographic and fractographic evaluation of 3D-printed titanium samples. Solid State Phenomena. 2017. Vol. 258, p. 171–176. https://www.scientific.net/SSP.270.212

Попов О. І. Упровадження штучного інтелекту для прогнозування властивостей металевих матеріалів. Комп’ютерно-інтегровані технології: освіта, наука, виробництво. 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384482833_Uprovadzenna_stucnogo_intelektu_dla_prognozuvanna_vlastivostej_metalevih_materialiv

Liu C., Zhang Q., Zhang J. et al. Digital Twin-enabled Collaborative Data Management for Metal Additive Manufacturing Systems. 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278612520300741

Phua A., Masood S. H., Ruan D. A digital twin hierarchy for metal additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 2022. Vol. 107, p. 530–535. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0166361522000641

Chheang V., Aremu A., Wu S. et al. Enabling additive manufacturing part inspection of digital twin… Scientific Reports. 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-80541-9

Lu Y., Slotwinski J. A., Moylan S. et al. An overarching quality evaluation framework for additive manufacturing in the context of digital twins. NIST, 2023. manuela-project.eu

Gaikwad A. Smart Additive Manufacturing: Sensing, Monitoring, and Machine Learning for Quality Assurance in Metal AM. PhD thesis. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 2022. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI29322978/

Тригубов О. В. Чисельне моделювання та цифрові двійники в процесах WAAM для керування якістю. Міжнародний науковий журнал «Механіка та машинобудування». 2025. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f0d6f7f5f315e5038f3eda11ce15e994/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar

Cao L., Hu W., Zhou T., Yu L., Huang X. Monitoring of Single-Track Melting States Based on Photodiode Signal during Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Sensors. 2023. Vol. 23, No. 24. 9793. DOI: 10.3390/s23249793.

Zegzulka J., Gelnar D., Jezerska L., Ramirez-Gomez A., Necas J., Rozbroj J. Internal Friction Angle of Metal Powders. Metals. 2018. Vol. 8, No. 4. 255. DOI: 10.3390/met8040255.

Published

2025-12-31