INTEGRATED INFORMATION MODELS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2025.4.3.18Keywords:
integrated IT models; sustainable development; ecological and economic analysis; digital platforms; decision support systemsAbstract
The article proposes an integrated information model of sustainable development management, which combines environmental and economic indicators into a single digital analytical circuit. The purpose of the study is to develop an integrated information model of sustainable development management based on environmental and economic analysis, which includes a structural and functional architecture, mathematical submodels of environmental and economic indicators, algorithms for their integration and calculation of generalized sustainability assessment indices. To achieve the goal, the mathematical operators of normalization, aggregation and integration used to construct a generalized sustainability index (SRI) were formalized, and the system was implemented in an IT environment. Within the framework of the methodology, sets of objects, indicators and time periods are defined, a formalized data structure and a multilayer architecture of the system are presented, which includes modules for data collection, storage, processing and visualization. To assess the effectiveness of the model, experimental load testing was conducted, within which the number of indicators increased from 10 to 10,000 per object. The results demonstrated the expected linear growth of processing time, the stability of the integration module and the absence of critical resource constraints. The increase in CPU and RAM usage corresponds to the behavior of high-load multidimensional analysis systems and is consistent with modern scientific research in the field of digital sustainability. The results obtained confirm the practical suitability of the model for use in environmental and economic monitoring, industrial and municipal management systems, and also determine the prospects for further development of the architecture.
References
Böttcher T. P., Empelmann S., Weking J., Hein A., Krcmar H. Digital sustainable business models: Using digital technology to integrate ecological sustainability into the core of business models. Information Systems Journal. 2024. Vol. 34, No. 3. P. 736–761. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12436
George G., Merrill R. K., Schillebeeckx S. J. D. Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2020. Vol. 45, No. 5. P. 999–1027. DOI: 10.1177/1042258719899425
Hariram N. P., Mekha K. B., Suganthan V., Sudhakar K. Sustainalism: An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 13. 10682. DOI: 10.3390/su151310682
Sharma P., Srivastava A., Bao C. Information systems-driven multi-disciplinary approaches to sustainability and circular economy. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2025. Vol. 52. 101007. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2025.101007
Zhang J., Liu M. How to leverage digital sustainability orientation to promote environmentally sustainable practices of manufacturing enterprises in China. Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 16, No. 12. 5112. DOI: 10.3390/su16125112
Al-Debei M. M., Avison D. Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems. 2010. Vol. 19, No. 3. P. 359–376. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.21
Geisendorf S., Klippert C. Integrated sustainability policy assessment – an agent-based ecological-economic model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2022. Vol. 32. P. 1017–1048. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-021-00749-0
Zhao A., Wang J., Sun Z., Guan H. Research on the evolutionary path of eco-conservation and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin based on an agent-based model. Systems. 2022. Vol. 10, No. 4. 105. DOI: 10.3390/systems10040105
Cengiz O., Baktemur F. İdil, Canoglu M. Estimating the role of economic globalization, technological development and household consumption on ecological footprint in Visegrad countries. Problemy Ekorozwoju. 2025. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 143–158. DOI: 10.35784/preko.6609
Yu Z., Guo X. D. Integration of ecological innovation, institutional governance, and human capital development for a sustainable environment in Asian Countries. Economic Research – Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2023. Vol. 36, No. 3. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155681
Xu G., Zhang J., Wang S. How digitalization and sustainability promote digital green innovation for Industry 5.0 through capability reconfiguration: Strategically oriented insights. Systems. 2024. Vol. 12, No. 9. 341. DOI: 10.3390/systems12090341
Khan A., Ximei W. Digital economy and environmental sustainability: Do information communication and technology (ICT) and economic complexity matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. Vol. 19, No. 19. 12301. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912301
Ghazawneh A., Henfridsson O. Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal. 2013. Vol. 23, No. 2. P. 173–192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.201
Adam M., Croitor E., Werner D., Benlian A., Wiener M. Input control and its signalling effects for complementors' intention to join digital platforms. Information Systems Journal. 2023. Vol. 33, No. 3. P. 437–466. DOI: 10.1111/isj.12408
Mohammadi N., Soltanifar E. Mapping the knowledge domain and emerging trends of sustainable startups. Discover Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 6. 1044. DOI: 10.1007/s43621-025-01949
