MODELS AND METHODS FOR SUPPORTING USER-CENTERED INTERFACE DESIGN OF DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEMS USING MACHINE LEARNING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2025.4.3.26

Keywords:

user interface, interface services, UCD, defense information systems, personalization, user behavior analytics, machine learning, lifecycle management, decision support

Abstract

This paper presents an extended scientific and methodological framework for developing and maintaining user- centered interface design in defense information systems. The proposed approach integrates conceptual modeling, formal representation of interface services, behavioral observation data, and machine learning methods to improve the quality, stability, and predictability of interface performance in mission-critical environments. The relevance of the study stems from the need to ensure consistent usability and operational reliability under rapidly changing mission objectives, diverse user roles, and increased requirements for task accuracy and speed. The paper introduces a multilayer conceptual model that describes the structure of interface services, the parameters of their implementation, their influence on key performance indicators (KPIs), and the role of user behavior characteristics in achieving those indicators. A generalized classification of interface service parameters is proposed, covering structural, functional, perceptual, and manipulative dimensions, as well as contextual conditions of use. Based on accumulated observation archives and cross- system comparisons, the study outlines methods for identifying critical characteristics that significantly affect the quality of interface support. To enhance decision-making across the system lifecycle, several machine learning techniques are proposed: prediction of KPI achievement depending on the selected implementation format; classification of potential interface requirement violations; assessment of the risks associated with insufficient or inconsistent requirements; and evaluation of reengineering or modernization activities. The resulting framework forms a unified data-driven analytical environment that supports design, audit, operational monitoring, and continuous improvement of defense system interfaces based on objective measurements, formal models, and reproducible analytical workflows.

References

Gould J. D., Lewis C. Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM. 1985. Vol. 28, No. 3. P. 300–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170

Norman D. A., Draper S. W. (eds.). User centered system design: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.

Mao J.-Y., Vredenburg K., Smith P. W., Carey T. The state of user-centered design practice. Communications of the ACM. 2005. Vol. 48, No. 3. P. 105–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1047671.1047677

Jameson A. Adaptive interfaces and systems. In: Jacko J.A. (ed.) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2014. P. 305–330

International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2019 – Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Geneva : ISO, 2019.

Fernández-Delgado M., Cernadas E., Barro S., Amorim D. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems? Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2014. Vol. 15. P. 3133–3181.

McElreath R. Statistical rethinking: a bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). New York : Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429029608

Hariri S., Carrasco Kind M., Brunner R. J. Extended Isolation Forest. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2021. Vol. 33, No. 4. P. 1479–1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2947676

Wager S., Athey S. Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2018. Vol. 113, No. 523. P. 1228–1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839

Oulasvirta A., Reichel A. Computational Interaction. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2022.

Chen X., Wu W. User behavior modeling for interface optimization based on machine learning. IEEE Access. 2020. Vol. 8. P. 107382–107395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999564

Published

2025-12-31