DIGITAL TWINS IN METAL ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35546/kntu2078-4481.2026.2.5

Keywords:

metal additive manufacturing (AM), laser powder bed fusion (LPBF/PBF), directed energy deposition (DED), wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM), digital twin (DT), in-situ monitoring, microstructure, porosity, quality

Abstract

The review focuses on digital twins (DT) in metal additive manufacturing, in particular laser powder bed fusion (LPBF; also powder bed fusion, PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED), including wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). The paper examines the role of digital twins as integrated computational and data-driven representations of physical manufacturing systems operating under layer-by-layer fabrication conditions. Digital-twin architectures are discussed at the “machine–process–part” levels together with in-situ monitoring data sources, such as optical and infrared (IR) cameras, photodiodes, acoustic, and electrical signals, which are used to capture process behavior and part formation characteristics during printing. The functional interaction between these architectural levels and their contribution to process understanding and quality assessment are considered. The paper systematizes physics-based models of heat transfer, melt-pool hydrodynamics, residual stress and distortion formation, and microstructure evolution, taking into account the multiphysical nature of metal additive manufacturing processes. Hybrid “physics+data” approaches and surrogate models that enable near real-time inference are summarized, emphasizing their role in reducing computational cost while maintaining consistency with physically grounded simulations and experimental observations. Typical DT tasks in additive manufacturing are highlighted: defect prediction (porosity, lack-of-fusion, cracks), process-parameter control, virtual quality qualification, and linking process parameters to microstructure and part properties. Based on the analysis of the literature, a conceptual algorithm for defect prediction in a near real-time mode is proposed, incorporating a feedback loop for updating the digital twin and (optionally) adjusting process parameters to maintain process stability and quality consistency.

References

Mukherjee T., DebRoy T. A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components. Applied Materials Today. 2019. Vol. 14. P. 59–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.11.003.

Gunasegaram D. R., Murphy A. B., Matthews M. J., DebRoy T. The case for digital twins in metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Physics: Materials. 2021. Vol. 4, No. 4. Art. 040401. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7639/ac09fb.

Koizumi Y., Okugawa M. Digital Twin Science of Metal Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: A Selective Review of Simulations for Integrated Computational Materials Engineering and Science. ISIJ International. 2022. Vol. 62, No. 11. P. 2183–2196. DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2022-184.

Liu C., Le Roux L., Körner C., Tabaste O., Lacan F., Bigot S. Digital twin-enabled collaborative data management for metal additive manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2020. Vol. 62. P. 857–874. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.05.010.

Ben Amor S., Elloumi N., Eltaief A., Louhichi B., Alrasheedi N. H., Seibi A. Digital Twin Implementation in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Processes. 2024. Vol. 12, No. 6. Art. 1062. DOI: 10.3390/pr12061062.

Tudorache L., Mihai A., Constantin G. та ін. Current approaches to digital twins in additive manufacturing: a systematic literature review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s40964-025-01262-7.

Bevans B. D., Carrington A., Riensche A. та ін. Digital twins for rapid in-situ qualification of part quality in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. 2024. Vol. 93. Art. 104415. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2024.104415.

Malik A. W., Mahmood M. A., Liou F. Digital twin–driven optimization of laser powder bed fusion processes: a focus on lack-of-fusion defects. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2024. Vol. 30, No. 10. P. 1977–1988. DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-02-2024-0091.

Phua A., Davies C. H. J., Delaney G. W. A digital twin hierarchy for metal additive manufacturing. Computers in Industry. 2022. Vol. 140. Art. 103667. DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103667.

Materialgeeza. SLS schematic.svg (Selective laser melting system schematic) [Електронний ресурс]. Wikimedia Commons. URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SLS_schematic.svg (дата звернення: 21.02.2026).

Panwisawas C., Tang Y. T., Reed R. C. Metal 3D printing as a disruptive technology for superalloys. Nature Communications. 2020. Vol. 11, No. 1. Art. 2327. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16188-7.

Published

2026-05-07